A legally binding contract needs three main elements: an offer, consideration, and acceptance. While the terms “offer” and “acceptance” are fairly straightforward — an offer is made, and either rejected or accepted — “consideration” refers to something of value that is being gained through the contract. If there is no consideration for one or more parties, then it casts a shadow over the legitimacy of the contract.
In other words, each party should be able to answer the question of why they entered into the agreement. Those who are unable to answer this question may not have been given proper consideration. This article provides a general overview of contractual consideration and how much of it is required for a contract to be valid.
How is Consideration Determined?
Basically, a consideration is determined when the two or more parties to a contract change their positions, such as promising something you are not legally required to do or promosing not to do something you are legally free to pursue. For instance, a company may promise to take down a website that is confusingly similar to your company’s website, which is not legally required to do, in exchange for you dropping your trademark infringement lawsuit against them (which you have a right to do). In this scenario, each side gains something of value — or consideration — from the agreement.
Consideration is Very Important
Generally, the courts will not reform a contract because one party made a bad bargain; but if the contract appears to be entered into under duress, there may be questions about whether there is adequate consideration. Consideration is the value bargained for by the parties, and most decisions indicate there is no reason to inquire into a party’s motivation for giving another party an incredible deal.
Having said that, consideration must meet other requirements. The consideration must be an exchange for the bargain in question; past consideration is no good.
Here is an example to consider. If Utah Corporation employs Donald under a contract for two years for $100,000. Six months later the president notes that Donald does not seem happy in his job. The president offers Donald $40,000 more to stay for the full term of the contract. At the end of the 2 years, Donald asks for the extra $40,000. There is no enforceable contract for the extra incentive pay. Under the original contract, Donald was already obligated to work for Utah Corporation for a full 2 years. The extra pay is not supported by new consideration; Donald is not giving anything that he did not previously agree to.
Now, if the $40,000 was offered to Donald to take on extra responsibilities or to work Friday nights, or something in addition to what he already contracted to do, and he did it; then, there would be additional consideration that would support the change to the contract. Does that make sense?
When a Contract Lacks Consideration
The court may, at times, declare that a contract lacks consideration for one or more of the parties involved, rendering it unenforceable. A contract may lack consideration if any of the following is true:
- The promise cannot legally (or practically) be offered
- Offer is made for something that already has been done (“past consideration”) and therefore cannot be bargained for
- One or more of the parties agreed to something he or she already was obligated to do
- A promise was actually a gift, not something bargained
Free Consultation with a Utah Breach of Contract Lawyer
If you are here, you probably have a breach of contract matter you need help with, call Ascent Law for your free contract law consultation (801) 676-5506. We want to help you.
8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite C
West Jordan, Utah
84088 United States
Telephone: (801) 676-5506
Recent Posts
